When Euphemisms (however By no means Sharks) Assault

Shark scientists have been exhorting the general public to name human-shark interactions one thing aside from shark assaults, preferring much less pejorative phrases like “shark encounters.” The scientists emphasize that people are usually accountable for shark accidents — stepping by chance on small sharks, which snap again; swimming in murky water, venturing too shut.

“A ‘shark assault’ is a narrative of intent,” Christopher Pepin-Neff of the College of Sydney, instructed the Instances reporter Alan Yuhas. “However sharks don’t know what persons are. They don’t know while you’re within the boat. They don’t know what a propeller is. It’s not an assault.”

However the phrases being provided as replacements, whereas extra correct and fewer inflammatory, have a hoop of gentility to them, evoking the highest hats and night gloves of centuries previous.

To wit, a shark incident:

“On Tuesday, the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks imposed “hoot owl” restrictions on the Missouri River, one of the most popular trout fishing sites in the state, between Helena and Great Falls because of warm water temperatures. The rule bans fishing after 2 p.m. (The term “hoot owl restrictions” stems from the early days of the timber industry. Loggers work early in the mornings of late summer, when it’s cooler, because the forests are dry and that increases the risk of chain saws or other equipment sparking a fire. Loggers often heard owls during their early morning shifts.)”


Source link

Previous post 3 states pursue public possibility for well being protection as feds balk
Next post Incentives, bonuses wanted to draw staff